Dargan v United Super Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 1527
It was reasonable for the defendants to reject the plaintiff's offer of compromise given the small margin between the offer and ultimate result, uncertainty regarding payment and income tax, and interpretation issues regarding the offer terms; the plaintiff is not entitled to indemnity costs under Pt 42 r 42.14.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Judgment (costs Determination)
- Outcome
- Defendants to pay plaintiff's costs on the ordinary basis.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'offers of Compromise' 'application of Uniform Civil Procedure Rules Pt 42 R 42.14']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Judgment (costs Determination)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the plaintiff is entitled to costs on an indemnity basis under Uniform Civil Procedure Rules Pt 42 r 42.14 based on an offer of compromise' "Whether the rejection of the plaintiff's offer of compromise was reasonable" 'Interpretation of terms of the offer of compromise']
Ratio Decidendi
It was reasonable for the defendants to reject the plaintiff's offer of compromise given the small margin between the offer and ultimate result, uncertainty regarding payment and income tax, and interpretation issues regarding the offer terms; the plaintiff is not entitled to indemnity costs under Pt 42 r 42.14.
Court Disposition
Defendants to pay plaintiff's costs on the ordinary basis.
Orders
- ["Defendants to pay plaintiff's costs on the ordinary basis."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment