Baird v CB Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd & anor [2009] NSWSC 476
Because the defendants agreed that a provisional liquidator should be appointed, there was no admissible evidence reflecting adversely on the fitness of the plaintiff's nominee Ashton Brailey, and the plaintiff's nominee should ordinarily be appointed absent a reason to doubt fitness or independence, Ashton Brailey was appointed provisional liquidator of the first defendant.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Proceeding for Winding Up and Interlocutory Application for Appointment of a Provisional Liquidator / Ex Tempore Judgment on Interlocutory Process
- Outcome
- Provisional liquidator appointed
- Legal Topics
- ['appointment of Provisional Liquidator' 'winding Up' 'identity and Independence of Liquidator']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Corporations Proceeding for Winding Up and Interlocutory Application for Appointment of a Provisional Liquidator / Ex Tempore Judgment on Interlocutory Process
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a provisional liquidator should be appointed to the first defendant company.' "Whether the plaintiff's nominated provisional liquidator, Ashton Brailey, should be appointed where the defendants opposed that nomination and proposed other official liquidators."]
Ratio Decidendi
Because the defendants agreed that a provisional liquidator should be appointed, there was no admissible evidence reflecting adversely on the fitness of the plaintiff's nominee Ashton Brailey, and the plaintiff's nominee should ordinarily be appointed absent a reason to doubt fitness or independence, Ashton Brailey was appointed provisional liquidator of the first defendant.
Court Disposition
Provisional liquidator appointed
Orders
- ['Pursuant to Corporations Act s 472(2), Ashton Brailey be appointed liquidator of the first defendant C B Constructions (NSW) Pty Limited provisionally.' 'Order 4 in the interlocutory process filed 24 April 2009 is made.' 'Costs of the interlocutory process be costs in the proceedings.' 'The proceedings are...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment