Brown, N & Ors v. Kingia Pty Ltd & Ors [1985] FCA 387
Applicants are entitled, at this stage, only to judgment against the third respondent for damages to be assessed and for costs. The determination of entitlement to interest and its rate under section 32 of the Supreme Court Act 1935 (WA) is to be made when damages are assessed, not at the stage of default judgment where no sum has yet been determined.
- Parties
- Applicant: John Baptist Nella; Applicant: Clifford Sydney Brown; Applicant: Barbara Sybil Brown; Applicant: Ian Willian Brown; First Respondent: Kingia Pty. Ltd.; Second Respondent: Ian David Asphar; Second Respondent: Peter Anthony McComish; Second Respondent: Robert William Waters; Third Respondent: Hilldodd Pty. Ltd.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 August 1985
- Procedural Posture
- Damages Claim / Judgment in Default of Filing Defence
- Outcome
- Judgment for applicants against third respondent for damages to be assessed; applicants to receive costs including one-half of costs of motion for judgment.
- Legal Topics
- Interest on Damages, Default Judgment, Statutory Interpretation, Damages Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Baptist Nella
Applicant
Clifford Sydney Brown
Applicant
Barbara Sybil Brown
Applicant
Ian Willian Brown
Applicant
Kingia Pty. Ltd.
First Respondent
Ian David Asphar
Second Respondent
Peter Anthony McComish
Second Respondent
Robert William Waters
Second Respondent
Hilldodd Pty. Ltd.
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Damages Claim / Judgment in Default of Filing Defence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether interest may be included in damages under section 32 of the Supreme Court Act 1935 (WA) in proceedings in the Federal Court.
- 2 Whether the Federal Court can, at the stage of default judgment, order payment of interest prior to assessment of damages.
- 3 Applicability of state law on interest to federal jurisdiction under section 79 of the Judiciary Act 1903.
Ratio Decidendi
Applicants are entitled, at this stage, only to judgment against the third respondent for damages to be assessed and for costs. The determination of entitlement to interest and its rate under section 32 of the Supreme Court Act 1935 (WA) is to be made when damages are assessed, not at the stage of default judgment where no sum has yet been determined.
Court Disposition
Judgment for applicants against third respondent for damages to be assessed; applicants to receive costs including one-half of costs of motion for judgment.
Orders
- Judgment be entered for the applicants against the third respondent for damages to be assessed.
- The third respondent pay the applicants their costs, including one-half of the costs of the applicants' motion for judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment