SHALOUB & ANOR v BUCHANAN [2003] NSWSC 682
Leave to amend the statement of claim to add a previously abandoned and statute-barred cause of action in injurious falsehood was refused because the plaintiffs had expressly abandoned it years before, further amendment would cause prejudice and delay, and there was no reasonable explanation for its revival.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application to Amend Statement of Claim
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' notice of motion dismissed; plaintiffs to pay the defendant's costs; action placed for general management.
- Legal Topics
- ['interlocutory Applications' 'amendment of Pleadings' 'injurious Falsehood' 'abandoned Causes of Action']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application to Amend Statement of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the plaintiffs should be granted leave to amend the statement of claim to add/replead a cause of action in injurious falsehood that was previously abandoned and is statute barred.']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to amend the statement of claim to add a previously abandoned and statute-barred cause of action in injurious falsehood was refused because the plaintiffs had expressly abandoned it years before, further amendment would cause prejudice and delay, and there was no reasonable explanation for its revival.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' notice of motion dismissed; plaintiffs to pay the defendant's costs; action placed for general management.
Orders
- ["Plaintiffs' notice of motion dismissed." "Plaintiffs to pay the defendant's costs." 'Action to be placed for general management in the Common Law Division.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment