Edwards v Woollahra Municipal Council & Anor [2004] NSWLEC 221
As there was no unusual circumstance to deprive the second respondent of costs, and proceedings were discontinued, the second respondent was entitled to her costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 April 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Class 4 Proceedings (land and Environment Court of Nsw) / Discontinuance; Application for Costs
- Outcome
- Leave to discontinue granted; applicant ordered to pay second respondent's costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'third Party Appeal' 'discontinuance of Proceedings' 'costs Following Discontinuance']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Class 4 Proceedings (land and Environment Court of Nsw) / Discontinuance; Application for Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether applicant is entitled to maintain proceedings in class 4 given legislative restrictions on third party appeals' 'Whether costs should be awarded to the second respondent upon discontinuance']
Ratio Decidendi
As there was no unusual circumstance to deprive the second respondent of costs, and proceedings were discontinued, the second respondent was entitled to her costs.
Court Disposition
Leave to discontinue granted; applicant ordered to pay second respondent's costs.
Orders
- ['Applicant granted leave to discontinue proceedings against the second respondent.' 'Applicant to pay the costs of the second respondent.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment