John Cuncliffe EDWARDS v Denise TERRY; Estate P. Edwards [2002] NSWSC 835
Balancing the plaintiff's needs, his circumstances of ill health, inability to work, lack of assets, and exclusion from significant provision in the will—with only limited disentitling conduct—warrants an increased lump sum provision of $45,000 to the plaintiff from the estate in lieu of the original bequest, with other legacies and the proportion for charities preserved.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: John Cuncliffe Edwards; Defendant: Denise Terry; Estate: Estate P. Edwards
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 August 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Family Provision Application / Judgment at First Instance
- Outcome
- Plaintiff succeeds; additional provision ordered
- Legal Topics
- Testator's Family Maintenance, Provision for Children, Eligibility for Provision, Factors Affecting Family Provision, Estrangement and Conduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Cuncliffe Edwards
Plaintiff
Denise Terry
Defendant
Estate P. Edwards
Estate
Procedural Posture
Family Provision Application / Judgment at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to further provision from the estate under the Family Provision Act
- 2 Whether the plaintiff's conduct disentitled him to provision
- 3 Appropriate quantum of additional provision from the estate
Ratio Decidendi
Balancing the plaintiff's needs, his circumstances of ill health, inability to work, lack of assets, and exclusion from significant provision in the will—with only limited disentitling conduct—warrants an increased lump sum provision of $45,000 to the plaintiff from the estate in lieu of the original bequest, with other legacies and the proportion for charities preserved.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff succeeds; additional provision ordered
Orders
- Plaintiff to receive a lump sum of $45,000 out of the estate in lieu of provision in the will
- The disputed debt is forgiven
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment