Bingham v Bevan [2023] NSWCA 186
Exceptional circumstances justifying a stay of order 3 were not established; there were not substantial prospects of special leave being granted; no real risk of losing subject matter of the appeal; balance of convenience did not favour a stay; therefore, notice of motion for stay dismissed with costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 August 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion for Stay Pending Special Leave Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion
- Outcome
- Notice of motion dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['stay of Orders' 'special Leave Application' 'costs' 'enforcement of Judgment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion for Stay Pending Special Leave Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether stay should be granted pending special leave application to High Court' 'Whether exceptional circumstances exist to warrant a stay' 'Whether balance of convenience favours granting stay' 'Whether risk exists of losing subject matter of appeal if stay not granted']
Ratio Decidendi
Exceptional circumstances justifying a stay of order 3 were not established; there were not substantial prospects of special leave being granted; no real risk of losing subject matter of the appeal; balance of convenience did not favour a stay; therefore, notice of motion for stay dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Notice of motion dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['On undertaking that respondent to notice of motion will not enforce orders 2(b) and 4 of 5 May 2023 pending final determination in High Court, notice of motion filed on 2 June 2023 dismissed.' "Applicant on notice of motion to pay respondent's costs of the notice of motion."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment