Ku-ring-gai Council v John David Chia (No 2) [2018] NSWLEC 44
No final substantive determination was made; the matter was adjourned to allow further submissions on the preliminary evidentiary question regarding the admissibility of evidence affected by potential infringement of the privilege against self-incrimination.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Environmental / Interlocutory Application for Exclusion of Evidence and Adjournment
- Outcome
- Adjournment granted for further submissions on discrete evidentiary question.
- Legal Topics
- ['self Incrimination' 'admissibility of Evidence' 'compulsory Interview' 'adjournment' 'right to Silence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Environmental / Interlocutory Application for Exclusion of Evidence and Adjournment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the use of a compulsory interview transcript to brief material witnesses infringes the right not to self-incriminate' 'Whether witnesses should be precluded from giving evidence due to exposure to compelled statements' 'Whether s 119S(5) provides clear legislative authority for admissibility overcoming privilege against self-incrimination']
Ratio Decidendi
No final substantive determination was made; the matter was adjourned to allow further submissions on the preliminary evidentiary question regarding the admissibility of evidence affected by potential infringement of the privilege against self-incrimination.
Court Disposition
Adjournment granted for further submissions on discrete evidentiary question.
Orders
- ['The parties are to prepare written submissions in respect of the discrete evidentiary question raised today by the defendant and provide them to my associate by 12pm Friday 20 April 2018.' 'The matter is stood over until Monday 23 April 2018.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment