Regina -v- John David VEITCH [1999] NSWCCA 185
The court found that a significant error occurred at trial: the purpose for introducing evidence of other sexual acts was not made clear and appropriate directions limiting the jury's use of such evidence were not given. As a result, the appeal should succeed, the conviction and sentence should be quashed, and a new trial ordered.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 July 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence quashed; new trial ordered.
- Legal Topics
- ['sexual Offences' 'tendency and Coincidence Evidence' 'relationship Evidence' 'complaint Evidence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether evidence of other sexual acts constituted relationship evidence or tendency evidence and the admissibility and proper use of such evidence under the Evidence Act 1995; whether appropriate directions were given to the jury regarding such evidence; whether the verdict was unsafe or unsatisfactory.']
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that a significant error occurred at trial: the purpose for introducing evidence of other sexual acts was not made clear and appropriate directions limiting the jury's use of such evidence were not given. As a result, the appeal should succeed, the conviction and sentence should be quashed, and a new trial ordered.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence quashed; new trial ordered.
Orders
- ['The appeal is allowed.' 'The conviction and sentence are quashed.' 'A new trial is ordered.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment