Regina v Dayeian [2000] NSWCCA 348
No error was exposed in the sentencing process; the sentence was within the proper range considering the seriousness of the offences and the applicant's subjective circumstances; although leave to appeal was granted, the appeal was dismissed as there was no basis for appellate intervention.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 August 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['sexual Intercourse Without Consent' 'severity of Sentence' 'special Circumstances in Sentencing' 'husband and Wife Offences']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive' 'Whether the sentencing judge failed to take into account relevant special circumstances']
Ratio Decidendi
No error was exposed in the sentencing process; the sentence was within the proper range considering the seriousness of the offences and the applicant's subjective circumstances; although leave to appeal was granted, the appeal was dismissed as there was no basis for appellate intervention.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment