HEYDON v NRMA & ORS, BATEMAN & ORS v NRMA & ORS, MORGAN & ORS v NRMA & ORS (No 2) [2001] NSWCA 445
Unless special circumstances are proven by the judgment creditor, interest on restituted judgment sums is to be calculated at the Schedule J rates, as this accords with the principles of unjust enrichment and restitutio in integrum. NRMA did not discharge the burden of establishing such circumstances.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 December 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Post Judgment; Ancillary Orders Following Successful Appeal
- Outcome
- Declaration that respondents obliged to pay interest at Schedule J rates; liberty to apply for further relief; respondents to pay appellants' costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['restitution of Money Paid Under Judgment' 'interest on Restitution' 'unjust Enrichment' 'schedule J Interest Rates' 'appeals and Reversal of Judgment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Judgment; Ancillary Orders Following Successful Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What is the appropriate rate of interest payable upon restitution of moneys paid under a judgment later set aside?' 'Is the respondent (NRMA) entitled to a departure from the usual Schedule J rates on the ground that it actually earned a lower rate of return?']
Ratio Decidendi
Unless special circumstances are proven by the judgment creditor, interest on restituted judgment sums is to be calculated at the Schedule J rates, as this accords with the principles of unjust enrichment and restitutio in integrum. NRMA did not discharge the burden of establishing such circumstances.
Court Disposition
Declaration that respondents obliged to pay interest at Schedule J rates; liberty to apply for further relief; respondents to pay appellants' costs.
Orders
- ['Declare that first respondents were obliged to pay interest calculated in accordance with the rates prescribed by Schedule J of the Supreme Court Rules from the relevant payment dates in August 1999 to 15 March 2001.' 'Liberty to apply for further relief.' "Respondents to pay appellants' costs of the motions."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment