Kellway v Kellway [1937] HCA 66
As the parties had agreed to resume cohabitation and the husband's refusal to carry out the agreement evidenced a final intention to terminate the matrimonial relationship, his conduct amounted to desertion on his part without just cause or excuse, satisfying the ground for dissolution under sec. 75(a) of the Marriage Act 1928 (Vic).
- Parties
- Appellant, Petitioner: Dorothy Margaret Mary Kellway; Respondent: John Evelyn Kellway
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Petition (appeal) / Appeal From Supreme Court of Victoria
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Decree nisi for dissolution granted.
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Desertion, Matrimonial Relationship, Appellate Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dorothy Margaret Mary Kellway
Appellant, Petitioner
John Evelyn Kellway
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Petition (appeal) / Appeal From Supreme Court of Victoria
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the husband's refusal to carry out an agreement for reconciliation constituted desertion under sec. 75(a) of the Marriage Act 1928 (Vic).
- 2 Whether the trial judge's findings on the intention of the parties should be reversed on appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
As the parties had agreed to resume cohabitation and the husband's refusal to carry out the agreement evidenced a final intention to terminate the matrimonial relationship, his conduct amounted to desertion on his part without just cause or excuse, satisfying the ground for dissolution under sec. 75(a) of the Marriage Act 1928 (Vic).
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Decree nisi for dissolution granted.
Orders
- Order appealed from discharged except as to costs.
- Decree nisi for dissolution of the marriage, not to be made absolute until three months from pronouncement.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment