Mahony v El Bayeh (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 325
Indemnity costs were awarded against the first defendant because his conduct—failing to appear, failing to challenge evidence, and failing to comply with court orders—unreasonably prolonged litigation and increased costs, while no countervailing reason existed for not making such an order.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: John Francis Mahony; First Defendant: Yousseff El Bayeh; Second Defendant: Ishtar Painting Pty Limited; Third Defendant: Intellect Constructions Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Proceedings / Costs Determination Following Orders
- Outcome
- Costs awarded; plaintiff's costs to be paid by first defendant on indemnity and ordinary basis.
- Legal Topics
- Indemnity Costs, Judicial Sale, Self Represented Litigant, Cross Claim
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Francis Mahony
Plaintiff
Yousseff El Bayeh
First Defendant
Ishtar Painting Pty Limited
Second Defendant
Intellect Constructions Pty Limited
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceedings / Costs Determination Following Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether indemnity costs order should be made against the defendant
- 2 Appropriate basis for costs where defendant failed to appear, challenge evidence, and comply with orders
Ratio Decidendi
Indemnity costs were awarded against the first defendant because his conduct—failing to appear, failing to challenge evidence, and failing to comply with court orders—unreasonably prolonged litigation and increased costs, while no countervailing reason existed for not making such an order.
Court Disposition
Costs awarded; plaintiff's costs to be paid by first defendant on indemnity and ordinary basis.
Orders
- First defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings on the summons and amended summons on the indemnity basis.
- First defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs of the notice of motion for an order giving leave to file the cross claim on the ordinary basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment