John Frederick Hillam v Ivan Peter Lewis [2012] NSWSC 640

John Frederick Hillam v Ivan Peter Lewis [2012] NSWSC 640

The plaintiff was not entitled to any equity or beneficial interest in the corporate defendants, as any oral agreement to that effect was only ever made contingently upon the successful raising of capital or bringing in a substantial investor, neither of which event occurred. The consulting fee arrangement for $20,000 per month was accepted as binding once a sale of equity or assets had occurred, and the plaintiff is entitled to $130,000 for consulting services rendered.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 June 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Proceeding / Principal Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Plaintiff awarded $130,000 for consulting fees; all other claims dismissed.
Legal Topics
['oral Contract' 'negotiations' 'contract Construction' 'declaration of Trust' 'commercial Context' 'purpose of Transaction' 'contemporaneous Evidence' 'witness Credibility' 'alleged Admission']
['contract Law' 'equity'] ['oral Contract' 'negotiations' 'contract Construction' 'declaration of Trust' 'commercial Context' 'purpose of Transaction' 'contemporaneous Evidence' 'witness Credibility' 'alleged Admission']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil Proceeding / Principal Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether there was a binding oral agreement for transfer of equity to the plaintiff in the defendant companies' 'Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a declaration of trust for a 10% equity interest' 'Whether the plaintiff is entitled to consulting fees and if so, in what amount' 'Whether any alleged oral agreement was unconditional or contingent on capital raising']

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff was not entitled to any equity or beneficial interest in the corporate defendants, as any oral agreement to that effect was only ever made contingently upon the successful raising of capital or bringing in a substantial investor, neither of which event occurred. The consulting fee arrangement for $20,000 per month was accepted as binding once a sale of equity or assets had occurred, and the plaintiff is entitled to $130,000 for consulting services rendered.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff awarded $130,000 for consulting fees; all other claims dismissed.

Orders

  • ['The sum of $130,000 is awarded in favour of the plaintiff in relation to the consulting fee agreement.' "The plaintiff's remaining claims are dismissed."]