Hillam v Leduva Pty Limited [2010] NSWSC 1360
The January 2008 contract for sale as varied by the June 2010 agreement was not validly terminated. Specific performance is granted as the plaintiff is ready, willing, and able to complete. Relief against forfeiture is granted and the possession orders are stayed, as the contract's objects remain attainable and defendant did not serve requisite notice to complete or termination.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Contract for Sale of Land; Claim for Specific Performance and Relief Against Forfeiture / Principal Judgment on Final Hearing
- Outcome
- Specific performance granted; relief against forfeiture granted; possession orders stayed; parties to prepare draft orders; costs reserved pending submissions.
- Legal Topics
- ['specific Performance' 'relief Against Forfeiture' 'sale of Land' 'variation of Contract' 'possession Proceedings' 'consent Judgment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Contract for Sale of Land; Claim for Specific Performance and Relief Against Forfeiture / Principal Judgment on Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Is the plaintiff entitled to relief against forfeiture of his interest in possession of the property?' 'Is the plaintiff entitled to set aside the consent orders entered in the possession proceedings?' 'Is the plaintiff entitled to specific performance of the contract for sale as varied by the compromise agreement?' 'Was the contract still on foot after entry of judgment in possession proceedings?' 'Did the defendant validly terminate the contract after 25 July 2010?' 'Was the plaintiff ready, willing and able to complete the contract?']
Ratio Decidendi
The January 2008 contract for sale as varied by the June 2010 agreement was not validly terminated. Specific performance is granted as the plaintiff is ready, willing, and able to complete. Relief against forfeiture is granted and the possession orders are stayed, as the contract's objects remain attainable and defendant did not serve requisite notice to complete or termination.
Court Disposition
Specific performance granted; relief against forfeiture granted; possession orders stayed; parties to prepare draft orders; costs reserved pending submissions.
Orders
- ['Direct parties to bring in short minutes of order to give effect to reasons.' 'Direct parties to file and exchange submissions on costs by 31 January 2011.' 'Grant liberty to apply.' 'Stay operation of possession orders until completion of sale.' 'Decree of specific performance of 8 January 2008 contract as varied...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment