Galaxidis v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 154
The totality of the sentences imposed on the applicant fairly and justly reflected his total criminality, and could not be said to be manifestly excessive or severe; the appeal against sentence should be dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Appeal Determination
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal against sentence granted. Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'guilty Pleas' 'dishonestly Obtaining by Deception a Financial Advantage' 'supply Prohibited Drug' 'excessive Sentence' 'totality Principle' 'parity Principle']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Appeal Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentence imposed was excessive' 'Whether the sentencing judge failed to apply the totality and parity principles' 'Whether the sentencing judge failed to specify the discount for guilty plea and assistance']
Ratio Decidendi
The totality of the sentences imposed on the applicant fairly and justly reflected his total criminality, and could not be said to be manifestly excessive or severe; the appeal against sentence should be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal against sentence granted. Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal against sentence granted.' 'Appeal against sentence dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment