John Goss Projects v Leighton Contractors & Anor [2006] NSWSC 798
The adjudicator's determination was void for denial of natural justice because he decided that prior obiter in Rothnere v Quasar was incorrect, forming part of his reasoning, without notifying the parties or inviting submissions on that point, which was not raised by either party, thus depriving John Goss of a fair opportunity to be heard; clause 45 of the contract was not void, as it did not conflict with the statutory timeframes but operated as a precondition to certain claims, not as a bar to the statutory entitlement to serve payment claims.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: John Goss Projects Pty Limited; First Defendant: Leighton Contractors Pty Limited; Second Defendant: Philip Davenport
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 August 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review/adjudication Challenge / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Partial success for plaintiff; adjudication determination declared void; other relief refused.
- Legal Topics
- Security of Payment, Natural Justice, Good Faith, Abuse of Process, Contractual Notice Clauses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Goss Projects Pty Limited
Plaintiff
Leighton Contractors Pty Limited
First Defendant
Philip Davenport
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review/adjudication Challenge / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the adjudicator denied natural justice in deciding on an unnotified ground
- 2 Whether the adjudicator failed to act in good faith
- 3 Whether clause 45 of the contract is void by operation of s 34 of the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999
Ratio Decidendi
The adjudicator's determination was void for denial of natural justice because he decided that prior obiter in Rothnere v Quasar was incorrect, forming part of his reasoning, without notifying the parties or inviting submissions on that point, which was not raised by either party, thus depriving John Goss of a fair opportunity to be heard; clause 45 of the contract was not void, as it did not conflict with the statutory timeframes but operated as a precondition to certain claims, not as a bar to the statutory entitlement to serve payment claims.
Court Disposition
Partial success for plaintiff; adjudication determination declared void; other relief refused.
Orders
- Declare that the second defendant's determination on 3 July 2006 of the plaintiff's adjudication application dated 22 June 2006 is void.
- Summons otherwise dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment