Grygiel v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2016] NSWSC 140
Although the plaintiff established a prima facie case for defamation, the balance of convenience did not favour granting an interlocutory injunction as the public interest in free speech outweighed the harm to the plaintiff and relevant defences and unresolved issues are proper questions for a jury. The application for injunction was therefore refused.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Interlocutory Injunction / Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- Application for injunction refused; costs awarded to defendant
- Legal Topics
- ['injunctions' 'interlocutory Injunctions' 'costs' 'defamation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Interlocutory Injunction / Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether to grant an interlocutory injunction restraining publication of an allegedly defamatory broadcast' 'Whether the balance of convenience favours the grant of an injunction in a defamation context']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the plaintiff established a prima facie case for defamation, the balance of convenience did not favour granting an interlocutory injunction as the public interest in free speech outweighed the harm to the plaintiff and relevant defences and unresolved issues are proper questions for a jury. The application for injunction was therefore refused.
Court Disposition
Application for injunction refused; costs awarded to defendant
Orders
- ['Application for interlocutory injunction refused' "Plaintiff to pay defendant's costs of and incidental to the application forthwith after assessment or agreement"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment