John Haralambides v Inner West Council [2017] NSWLEC 1345
An agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 was reached between the parties and was acceptable, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the Court could have made such a decision, therefore the proceedings were disposed of in accordance with that agreement.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application / Final Orders Issued After Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Application upheld and development consent granted subject to conditions; costs ordered against Applicant.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Applications' 'conciliation Conferences' 'court Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Development Application / Final Orders Issued After Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Class 1 development application should be upheld and development consent granted for additions and alterations including a boarding house']
Ratio Decidendi
An agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 was reached between the parties and was acceptable, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the Court could have made such a decision, therefore the proceedings were disposed of in accordance with that agreement.
Court Disposition
Application upheld and development consent granted subject to conditions; costs ordered against Applicant.
Orders
- ['The Class 1 application is upheld.' 'Development consent for additions and alterations to an existing commercial building, and the addition of a boarding house on level 1 and 2 above the existing retail level at 52-54 Lackley Street, Summer Hill, NSW 2130, is approved subject to the conditions set out on Annexure...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment