Iacullo v Hillam [2014] NSWSC 624

Iacullo v Hillam [2014] NSWSC 624

There are uncertainties and technicalities in the respondent's affidavit and the evidentiary documents, making it inappropriate to grant judgment on admissions for the $200,000 loan claim. Instead, the plaintiffs are granted leave to move for summary judgment, with directions for evidence to clarify the alleged payment.

Parties
First Plaintiff: Dominic Iacullo; Second Plaintiff: Lillian Iacullo; Defendant: John Hillam
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 May 2014
Procedural Posture
Equity Division Commercial List / Interlocutory Application for Judgment on Admissions and Leave to Move for Summary Judgment
Outcome
Judgment on admissions refused for $200,000 claim; leave granted to move for summary judgment; orders made for procedural steps; payment of $155,000 noted and costs reserved.
Legal Topics
Judgment on Admissions, Summary Judgment, Loan Agreements, Evidence Admissibility
Civil Procedure Judgment on Admissions Summary Judgment Loan Agreements Evidence Admissibility

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dominic Iacullo

First Plaintiff

Lillian Iacullo

Second Plaintiff

John Hillam

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Equity Division Commercial List / Interlocutory Application for Judgment on Admissions and Leave to Move for Summary Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether judgment on admissions is appropriate for a $200,000 loan claim
  2. 2 Whether to grant leave to apply for summary judgment for $200,000 loan

Ratio Decidendi

There are uncertainties and technicalities in the respondent's affidavit and the evidentiary documents, making it inappropriate to grant judgment on admissions for the $200,000 loan claim. Instead, the plaintiffs are granted leave to move for summary judgment, with directions for evidence to clarify the alleged payment.

Court Disposition

Judgment on admissions refused for $200,000 claim; leave granted to move for summary judgment; orders made for procedural steps; payment of $155,000 noted and costs reserved.

Orders

  • I note that the sum of $155,000, being part of the claim made by the plaintiffs against the defendant, was paid by the defendant to the plaintiffs this morning.
  • I reserve the question of costs in respect of that aspect of the claim.