CARR & ANOR v FISCHER & ORS [2005] NSWSC 31

CARR & ANOR v FISCHER & ORS [2005] NSWSC 31

The court was not persuaded that the plaintiffs' rejection of the Calderbank offer or failure to comply with its extended deadline was unreasonable in light of the timing (mid-hearing, complexity, lack of forensic disclosure, and substantial costs already incurred), and therefore the application for indemnity costs was dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 February 2005
Procedural Posture
Application / Post Judgment (indemnity Costs Application)
Outcome
Application for indemnity costs dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['indemnity Costs' 'calderbank Offers' 'reasonableness of Rejection']
['civil Procedure'] ['indemnity Costs' 'calderbank Offers' 'reasonableness of Rejection']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application / Post Judgment (indemnity Costs Application)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the plaintiffs' rejection of the defendants' Calderbank offer was unreasonable such as to warrant indemnity costs"]

Ratio Decidendi

The court was not persuaded that the plaintiffs' rejection of the Calderbank offer or failure to comply with its extended deadline was unreasonable in light of the timing (mid-hearing, complexity, lack of forensic disclosure, and substantial costs already incurred), and therefore the application for indemnity costs was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application for indemnity costs dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ["Defendants' application for indemnity costs dismissed." 'Plaintiffs to have costs of the application.']