HIH Casualty & General Insurance Australia Ltd v DellaVedova [1999] FCA 456

HIH Casualty & General Insurance Australia Ltd v DellaVedova [1999] FCA 456

The respondents were not aware, at the inception of the policy, of any circumstances which may give rise to a claim against them; there was no breach of duty of disclosure or misrepresentation, and the insurers were required to indemnify the respondents under the policy.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 April 1999
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / On Appeal From the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['professional Indemnity Insurance' 'claims Made Policies' 'duty of Disclosure' 'non Disclosure' 'misrepresentation' 'construction of Policy Terms' 'appellate Review of Factual Findings']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / On Appeal From the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory

  1. 1 ['Whether there was a breach of duty of disclosure under s 21 Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth)' 'Whether the claim arose out of a circumstance or occurrence of which insured were aware at the policy inception' "Whether the insured's answer to the proposal form amounted to misrepresentation" 'Role of the appellate court in findings of fact']

Ratio Decidendi

The respondents were not aware, at the inception of the policy, of any circumstances which may give rise to a claim against them; there was no breach of duty of disclosure or misrepresentation, and the insurers were required to indemnify the respondents under the policy.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['Appeal dismissed.' "Appellants to pay respondents' costs of appeal to be taxed."]