Gittins v Field (Trustee) [2018] FCA 976
The monthly payments received by the applicant under income protection insurance policies constitute 'income' for the purposes of Division 4B of Part VI of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), and are subject to the statutory income contribution scheme even if they are also characterised as compensation for personal injury under s 116(2)(g). The relevant provisions operate independently: the liability for contribution arises by operation of Division 4B, and neither the benefits themselves nor the obligation created by Division 4B vest in the trustee as divisible property. The statutory contribution regime must be given effect and is not limited by s 116(2)(g) in relation to 'income'.
- Parties
- Applicant: John James Gittins; Respondent: Malcolm Field
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Application for Declaratory Relief / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Income Protection Policies, Personal Injury Compensation, Income Contributions, Bankrupt's Property, Divisibility of Property
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John James Gittins
Applicant
Malcolm Field
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Application for Declaratory Relief / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether income protection payments received by the bankrupt are 'income' for the purposes of Division 4B, Part VI of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)
- 2 Whether such payments are excluded from divisible property under s 116(2)(g) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) as compensation for personal injury
- 3 Whether the trustee is entitled to claim those benefits or require a contribution calculated by reference to them
Ratio Decidendi
The monthly payments received by the applicant under income protection insurance policies constitute 'income' for the purposes of Division 4B of Part VI of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), and are subject to the statutory income contribution scheme even if they are also characterised as compensation for personal injury under s 116(2)(g). The relevant provisions operate independently: the liability for contribution arises by operation of Division 4B, and neither the benefits themselves nor the obligation created by Division 4B vest in the trustee as divisible property. The statutory contribution regime must be given effect and is not limited by s 116(2)(g) in relation to 'income'.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment