Price v Fitzgerald [2000] FCA 134
Section 3E(1) of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) confers powers on magistrates as designated persons, not on magistrates as members of a court; thus, it does not infringe Chapter III of the Constitution.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / On Appeal From a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['conferral of Administrative Powers on Magistrate' 'separation of Powers' 'designated Person Doctrine' 'operation and Construction of Crimes Act 1914 (cth) S 3 E(1)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Appeal / On Appeal From a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether s 3E(1) of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) confers powers on a State court or on a magistrate as a designated person' 'Whether conferral of administrative functions on a magistrate under s 3E contravenes Chapter III of the Constitution']
Ratio Decidendi
Section 3E(1) of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) confers powers on magistrates as designated persons, not on magistrates as members of a court; thus, it does not infringe Chapter III of the Constitution.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the respondent's costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment