Kells v Mulligan & Anor [2002] NSWSC 769
The Costs Assessor's decisions regarding instructions and interest were not reasonably open based on available evidence, constituting errors of law. The Panel failed to conduct review on the required evidence, further vitiating the determinations.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 August 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Appeal / Appeal From Costs Assessor and Panel Review
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; determinations set aside and remitted to Costs Assessor for re-determination; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs Assessment' 'interest on Costs' 'instructions to Commence Proceedings' 'procedural Review']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Costs Appeal / Appeal From Costs Assessor and Panel Review
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Costs Assessor erred in finding no instruction to commence Supreme Court proceedings' 'Whether the Costs Assessor erred in declining interest on costs' 'Whether the Panel review complied with statutory requirements']
Ratio Decidendi
The Costs Assessor's decisions regarding instructions and interest were not reasonably open based on available evidence, constituting errors of law. The Panel failed to conduct review on the required evidence, further vitiating the determinations.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; determinations set aside and remitted to Costs Assessor for re-determination; costs reserved.
Orders
- ['Set aside determinations made by the Costs Assessor and Panel.' 'Decisions on instructions and interest remitted to Costs Assessor for re-determination.' 'Question of costs reserved.' 'Exhibits may be returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment