Mannix v Loumbos Pty Ltd [2000] NSWCA 32

Mannix v Loumbos Pty Ltd [2000] NSWCA 32

The trial judge's costs discretion miscarried because neither the cryptic file note of the 14 June conversation nor the failure to discuss the rent review clause again at execution of the lease amounted to misconduct or lax conduct effectively inviting the litigation; the successful defendants were therefore...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 February 2000
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal Against an Order for Costs / Court of Appeal
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; appeal upheld with costs; District Court costs order set aside.
Legal Topics
['costs Discretion' "successful Party's Entitlement to Costs" 'breach of Retainer' 'rent Review Clause']
['civil Procedure' 'costs' 'professional Negligence'] ['costs Discretion' "successful Party's Entitlement to Costs" 'breach of Retainer' 'rent Review Clause']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal Against an Order for Costs / Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether leave to appeal should be granted from the District Court costs order that each party bear its own costs.' "Whether the trial judge's costs discretion miscarried by treating the successful defendants' conduct as disentitling them to costs." "Whether the solicitors' file note and conduct at execution of the lease amounted to lax conduct effectively inviting the litigation."]

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge's costs discretion miscarried because neither the cryptic file note of the 14 June conversation nor the failure to discuss the rent review clause again at execution of the lease amounted to misconduct or lax conduct effectively inviting the litigation; the successful defendants were therefore entitled to their costs.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; appeal upheld with costs; District Court costs order set aside.

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal be granted.' 'The appeal be upheld with costs.' 'The cost order below be set aside.' "There be substituted for the order made below an order that the plaintiff pay the defendant's costs of and incidental to the proceedings."]