Kline v Liverpool City Council [2020] NSWLEC 1478
The Court, satisfied that the parties' agreement to uphold the appeal and substitute the order is one properly able to be made, orders accordingly in accordance with s 34(3) of the LEC Act.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Conciliation Conference and Determination
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld. Substituted order made in accordance with agreement.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Control Order' 'stop Use Order' 'demolish Works Order' 'conciliation Conference' 'use of Premises as Depot' 'substituted Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Conciliation Conference and Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the premises were used for a prohibited purpose (depot) without development consent' 'Whether unauthorised works (construction of a concrete slab exceeding 20m²) had been carried out' 'Whether the substituted order reflected agreement and statutory requirements']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court, satisfied that the parties' agreement to uphold the appeal and substitute the order is one properly able to be made, orders accordingly in accordance with s 34(3) of the LEC Act.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld. Substituted order made in accordance with agreement.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Pursuant to s. 8.18 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, the development control order in Annexure A is substituted for the Development Control Order given by the Respondent to the Applicant on 22 May 2020.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment