Leiseboer v Phillips and Anor [2023] NSWDC 247
The court was not satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the parties' conversation and conduct in January 2021 evidenced an intention to enter into a new enforceable contractual relationship varying the original written agreement. The evidence established, at most, a creation of expectations rather than binding legal obligations. Therefore, the plaintiff's claim based on the purported variation or new agreement failed.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: John Leiseboer; First Defendant: Wayne Richard Phillips; Second Defendant: Jo-Ann Christina Phillips
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Contract Between Family Members, Oral Variation of Agreement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Leiseboer
Plaintiff
Wayne Richard Phillips
First Defendant
Jo-Ann Christina Phillips
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an oral variation or new contract superseded a written loan agreement between family members
- 2 Whether the parties had the intention to create legal relations in the alleged oral conversation of 20 January 2021
Ratio Decidendi
The court was not satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the parties' conversation and conduct in January 2021 evidenced an intention to enter into a new enforceable contractual relationship varying the original written agreement. The evidence established, at most, a creation of expectations rather than binding legal obligations. Therefore, the plaintiff's claim based on the purported variation or new agreement failed.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim dismissed
Orders
- The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
- The plaintiff pay the first and second defendants' costs of the proceedings (as agreed or assessed).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment