John Leo FISHER v R [2019] NSWDC 297
The appellant established, on the balance of probabilities, the existence and use of a public right of way across Lot 2541, as supported by consistent official maps and long public use, relying on s 4(1) Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901. The Crown failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that no right of way...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: John Leo Fisher; Respondent: Crown
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / District Court Appeal From Local Court Conviction
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Trespass to Inclosed Land, Public Right of Way, Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901 S 4(1), Proof of Public Road, Burden of Proof in Criminal Matters
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Leo Fisher
Appellant
Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / District Court Appeal From Local Court Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appellant was using a public right of way and thus not guilty under s 4(1) Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901
- 2 Whether Crown discharged its onus to prove the absence of a right of way at time of alleged offence
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant established, on the balance of probabilities, the existence and use of a public right of way across Lot 2541, as supported by consistent official maps and long public use, relying on s 4(1) Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901. The Crown failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that no right of way existed or that the appellant's route was unreasonable. Appeal allowed, conviction and sentence set aside.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Conviction recorded and the sentence passed by the Local Court at Goulburn on 15 May 2018 set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment