Burrell, John Llewellyn v Connell, Ross Ian [1998] FCA 828

Burrell, John Llewellyn v Connell, Ross Ian [1998] FCA 828

The application for a further adjournment was refused because Mr Connell had not taken reasonable steps to obtain the transcript he claimed to require, including simple steps such as telephoning the Court or Auscript or notifying the applicant's solicitors, and the further explanation concerning Mr Kavanagh did not...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 July 1998
Procedural Posture
Application for Adjournment / Hearing of Respondent's Further Adjournment Application
Outcome
Application for an adjournment refused.
Legal Topics
['adjournment' 'transcript' 'conduct of Litigation']
['civil Procedure'] ['adjournment' 'transcript' 'conduct of Litigation']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Adjournment / Hearing of Respondent's Further Adjournment Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the respondent should be granted a further adjournment because he had been unable to obtain the transcript of the hearing on 1 June 1998.']

Ratio Decidendi

The application for a further adjournment was refused because Mr Connell had not taken reasonable steps to obtain the transcript he claimed to require, including simple steps such as telephoning the Court or Auscript or notifying the applicant's solicitors, and the further explanation concerning Mr Kavanagh did not advance the adjournment application.

Court Disposition

Application for an adjournment refused.

Orders

  • ['I refuse the application for an adjournment.']