Lawrence, J.L. v Porter, B. & Ors [1987] FCA 458
The Federal Council’s actions to amend the rules and pursue ACTU affiliation, including the use of a postal ballot, did not contravene the rules of the Australian Journalists Association or the requirements of the Act. Earlier plebiscites did not fetter the Council’s powers, and Council members’ acquiescence constituted sufficient waiver of notice requirements for urgent business. The applicant failed to show that the rules were oppressive, unreasonable, unjust or in breach of the regulations.
- Parties
- Applicant: John Lockwood Lawrence; First Respondent: Barry Porter; Second Respondent: Jane Singleton; Third Respondent: Brendan Donohoe; Fourth Respondent: Christopher Warren; Fifth Respondent: Catriona Wilson; Sixth Respondent: Pat O'Donnell; Seventh Respondent: Wayne Watson; Eighth Respondent: John Brittle; Ninth Respondent: Norman Taylor; Tenth Respondent: Richard Scherer; Eleventh Respondent: Tom Barrass; Twelfth Respondent: Adrian Wild; Thirteenth Respondent: Neal Swancott; Fourteenth Respondent: Gavin Cantlon; Fifteenth Respondent: Brad Turner; Sixteenth Respondent: Katrina Willis; Seventeenth Respondent: Gail Luxford; Eighteenth Respondent: Lindsay Foyle; Nineteenth Respondent: Geoffrey Hughes; Twentieth Respondent: Bob Beatty; Twenty First Respondent: Rada Rouse; Twenty Second Respondent: David Halpin; Twenty Third Respondent: Liz Fell; Twenty Fourth Respondent: Mark Camm; Twenty Fifth Respondent: Richard McGregor; Twenty Sixth Respondent: Bill Preece; Twenty Seventh Respondent: Michael Sutherland; Twenty Eighth Respondent: Ray Frawley; Twenty Ninth Respondent: Lachlan McDonald; Thirtieth Respondent: Anne-Marie Strickland; Thirty First Respondent: Gavin Whyte; Thirty Second Respondent: Agnes Warren; Thirty Third Respondent: Susan Peak; Thirty Fourth Respondent: Kevin Grover; Thirty Fifth Respondent: Margaret Simons; Thirty Sixth Respondent: Duncan Clarke; Thirty Seventh Respondent: Norm Harridien; Thirty Eighth Respondent: Liz Allen; Thirty Ninth Respondent: Arthur Corrie; Fortieth Respondent: Des Driberg; Forty First Respondent: Barton Green; Forty Second Respondent: William Rust; Forty Third Respondent: Julie Duncan; Forty Fourth Respondent: Peter Baker; Forty Fifth Respondent: Richard Creswick; Forty Sixth Respondent: Anne Giles; Forty Seventh Respondent: Genine Read; Forty Eighth Respondent: Jerry Maher; Forty Ninth Respondent: Paul Lewar; Fiftieth Respondent: Will Atkins; Fifty First Respondent: Maxwell Watson; Fifty Second Respondent: Charles Phillips; Fifty Third Respondent: The Australian Journalists Association
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 August 1987
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904, Ss.140, 141 / Final Judgment at First Instance
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Union Rules, Affiliation With ACTU, Right to Plebiscite, Interpretation of Association Rules, Validity of Postal Ballot, Oppression Under S.140
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Lockwood Lawrence
Applicant
Barry Porter
First Respondent
Jane Singleton
Second Respondent
Brendan Donohoe
Third Respondent
Christopher Warren
Fourth Respondent
Catriona Wilson
Fifth Respondent
Pat O'Donnell
Sixth Respondent
Wayne Watson
Seventh Respondent
John Brittle
Eighth Respondent
Norman Taylor
Ninth Respondent
Richard Scherer
Tenth Respondent
Tom Barrass
Eleventh Respondent
Adrian Wild
Twelfth Respondent
Neal Swancott
Thirteenth Respondent
Gavin Cantlon
Fourteenth Respondent
Brad Turner
Fifteenth Respondent
Katrina Willis
Sixteenth Respondent
Gail Luxford
Seventeenth Respondent
Lindsay Foyle
Eighteenth Respondent
Geoffrey Hughes
Nineteenth Respondent
Bob Beatty
Twentieth Respondent
Rada Rouse
Twenty First Respondent
David Halpin
Twenty Second Respondent
Liz Fell
Twenty Third Respondent
Mark Camm
Twenty Fourth Respondent
Richard McGregor
Twenty Fifth Respondent
Bill Preece
Twenty Sixth Respondent
Michael Sutherland
Twenty Seventh Respondent
Ray Frawley
Twenty Eighth Respondent
Lachlan McDonald
Twenty Ninth Respondent
Anne-Marie Strickland
Thirtieth Respondent
Gavin Whyte
Thirty First Respondent
Agnes Warren
Thirty Second Respondent
Susan Peak
Thirty Third Respondent
Kevin Grover
Thirty Fourth Respondent
Margaret Simons
Thirty Fifth Respondent
Duncan Clarke
Thirty Sixth Respondent
Norm Harridien
Thirty Seventh Respondent
Liz Allen
Thirty Eighth Respondent
Arthur Corrie
Thirty Ninth Respondent
Des Driberg
Fortieth Respondent
Barton Green
Forty First Respondent
William Rust
Forty Second Respondent
Julie Duncan
Forty Third Respondent
Peter Baker
Forty Fourth Respondent
Richard Creswick
Forty Fifth Respondent
Anne Giles
Forty Sixth Respondent
Genine Read
Forty Seventh Respondent
Jerry Maher
Forty Eighth Respondent
Paul Lewar
Forty Ninth Respondent
Will Atkins
Fiftieth Respondent
Maxwell Watson
Fifty First Respondent
Charles Phillips
Fifty Second Respondent
The Australian Journalists Association
Fifty Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application Under the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904, Ss.140, 141 / Final Judgment at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposal to affiliate with ACTU was in breach of AJA rules
- 2 Whether the rules or the amendment to allow affiliation were oppressive, unreasonable or unjust under s.140
- 3 Whether earlier plebiscites prevent Council action
Ratio Decidendi
The Federal Council’s actions to amend the rules and pursue ACTU affiliation, including the use of a postal ballot, did not contravene the rules of the Australian Journalists Association or the requirements of the Act. Earlier plebiscites did not fetter the Council’s powers, and Council members’ acquiescence constituted sufficient waiver of notice requirements for urgent business. The applicant failed to show that the rules were oppressive, unreasonable, unjust or in breach of the regulations.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- That the amended rule nisi be discharged.
- That the interim orders made by the Full Court on 20 May 1987 restraining the respondents from taking any step to prosecute the AJA's affiliation application, be discharged.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment