Werner v Commonwealth [2022] NSWSC 1388

Werner v Commonwealth [2022] NSWSC 1388

The Court granted access to Dr Hopwood's subpoenaed material and listed the limitation question for hearing because the parties could be accommodated in December and the privilege objection should not prevent progress where waiver appeared reasonably clear. Costs up to and including the first day of the motion were reserved because the expedition issue was not determined and the application was not accepted as without merit. The plaintiff was ordered to pay the defendant's costs of the second day because the unresolved privilege claim, which the plaintiff's lawyers ought to have considered before pursuing the expedited motion, unnecessarily delayed resolution and required the defendant to...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 October 2022
Procedural Posture
Application for Expedited Hearing of Limitation Issue; Procedural Ruling in Common Law Proceedings / Notice of Motion Before Duty Judge; Orders and Case Management Directions Made
Outcome
Access granted to subpoenaed material; limitation issues listed for hearing with case management directions; costs reserved in part and plaintiff ordered to pay defendant's costs of second day of motion.
Legal Topics
['expedited Hearing' 'separate Determination of Limitation Issue' 'subpoena Access' 'waiver of Privilege' 'case Management Directions' 'costs of Notice of Motion']
['civil Procedure' 'costs' 'limitation of Actions' 'privilege'] ['expedited Hearing' 'separate Determination of Limitation Issue' 'subpoena Access' 'waiver of Privilege' 'case Management Directions' 'costs of Notice of Motion']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Expedited Hearing of Limitation Issue; Procedural Ruling in Common Law Proceedings / Notice of Motion Before Duty Judge; Orders and Case Management Directions Made

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether access should be granted to both parties to material produced on subpoena by Dr M Hopwood.' "Whether the Limitation Act issue should be listed for hearing and potentially determined separately from the plaintiff's substantive claim." "Whether the plaintiff's suit should be allowed to be brought outside the limitation period." 'Whether costs of the notice of motion should be reserved or awarded against the plaintiff for the second day of hearing.']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court granted access to Dr Hopwood's subpoenaed material and listed the limitation question for hearing because the parties could be accommodated in December and the privilege objection should not prevent progress where waiver appeared reasonably clear. Costs up to and including the first day of the motion were reserved because the expedition issue was not determined and the application was not accepted as without merit. The plaintiff was ordered to pay the defendant's costs of the second day because the unresolved privilege claim, which the plaintiff's lawyers ought to have considered before pursuing the expedited motion, unnecessarily delayed resolution and required the defendant to...

Court Disposition

Access granted to subpoenaed material; limitation issues listed for hearing with case management directions; costs reserved in part and plaintiff ordered to pay defendant's costs of second day of motion.

Orders

  • ['Grant access to both parties to the material produced on subpoena by Dr M Hopwood.' "List the matter for hearing on 6 and 7 December 2022 for argument as to whether the Limitation Act issue should be determined as a separate issue from the plaintiff's substantive claim and, if so, whether the plaintiff's suit...