JOHN LYSAGHT (AUSTRALIA) LTD v COX [1990] NSWCA 99
The respondent was not entitled to maintain a claim for binaural loss of hearing under the 1987 Act because the injury (further impairment of hearing) occurred before the commencement of Division 4 of Pt3 of the 1987 Act and such loss was not compensable under s16 of the 1926 Act; thus cl5 applied, barring the claim.
- Parties
- Appellant: John Lysaght (Australia) Ltd; Respondent: Cox
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 September 1990
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment of Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Transitional Provisions, Industrial Deafness, Compensation for Hearing Loss
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Lysaght (Australia) Ltd
Appellant
Cox
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment of Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether transitional provisions in 1987 Act permit a claim for binaural loss of hearing where such claims were not recognised under the 1926 Act
- 2 Whether a legally binding agreement to receive compensation under the 1926 Act existed
- 3 Whether the injury is deemed to have occurred before the commencement of the 1987 Act for purposes of cl5, Pt6, Sch6
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent was not entitled to maintain a claim for binaural loss of hearing under the 1987 Act because the injury (further impairment of hearing) occurred before the commencement of Division 4 of Pt3 of the 1987 Act and such loss was not compensable under s16 of the 1926 Act; thus cl5 applied, barring the claim.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Respondent to pay appellant's costs of the appeal and to have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act.
- Proceedings remitted to the Compensation Court to be dealt with in accordance with these reasons.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment