Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited [2000] NSWSC 519
The defendant is not permitted to cross-examine the plaintiff on the subject matter or contents of conversations recorded on the 'Elomari tapes' by reference to or use of the tapes or any transcript thereof, due to the operation of the Listening Devices Act and the Evidence Act, and in light of probative/prejudicial balancing and pending appeal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 June 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Evidentiary Ruling During Trial
- Outcome
- Evidence excluded; cross-examination not permitted as described.
- Legal Topics
- ['admissibility' 'cross Examination' 'listening Devices Act 1984' 'private Conversations']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Evidentiary Ruling During Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the defendant may cross-examine the plaintiff on the contents of recorded conversations (the 'Elomari tapes') under the Listening Devices Act 1984 and the Evidence Act 1995"]
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant is not permitted to cross-examine the plaintiff on the subject matter or contents of conversations recorded on the 'Elomari tapes' by reference to or use of the tapes or any transcript thereof, due to the operation of the Listening Devices Act and the Evidence Act, and in light of probative/prejudicial balancing and pending appeal.
Court Disposition
Evidence excluded; cross-examination not permitted as described.
Orders
- ["Defendant not to cross-examine the plaintiff on the subject matter or contents of the 'Elomari tapes' by reference to or use of either the tapes or any transcript thereof."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment