Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited [2000] NSWSC 98
The tender of the tapes and warrants was rejected because the warrants did not comply with statutory requirements for form and content under the Listening Devices Act 1984, and there was insufficient evidence that the conditions of the warrant had been fulfilled. Therefore, the tapes were not proved to have been...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Evidentiary Ruling
- Outcome
- Tender of tapes and warrants rejected
- Legal Topics
- ['admissibility of Evidence' 'listening Devices Act 1984' 'police Integrity Commission Act 1996' 'private Conversations' 'tender of Tapes']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Evidentiary Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Admissibility of tapes obtained by listening devices under the Listening Devices Act 1984 in civil proceedings' 'Requirements for proof of validity of warrants authorising listening devices' 'Effect of non-compliance with statutory requirements for warrants on admissibility of evidence']
Ratio Decidendi
The tender of the tapes and warrants was rejected because the warrants did not comply with statutory requirements for form and content under the Listening Devices Act 1984, and there was insufficient evidence that the conditions of the warrant had been fulfilled. Therefore, the tapes were not proved to have been lawfully obtained and were inadmissible.
Court Disposition
Tender of tapes and warrants rejected
Orders
- ['Tender of tapes (MFI 101) rejected' 'Warrants (exhibit 53) remain on the record but have no probative effect']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment