Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited [1999] NSWSC 1186
The proposed evidence of applause and acclamation by the crowd was inadmissible in chief because its logical import depended on a specific act or fact involving the plaintiff, namely his championing or promoting anti-vilification legislation, and was therefore caught by the exclusionary principle against proving...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 December 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation Proceedings / Ruling on Objection to Admissibility of Reputation Evidence
- Outcome
- Objection upheld; proposed line of questions disallowed.
- Legal Topics
- ['admissibility of Evidence' 'reputation Evidence' 'specific Acts or Facts' 'good Settled Reputation']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Defamation Proceedings / Ruling on Objection to Admissibility of Reputation Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the plaintiff could lead evidence from Mr Pickering about applause and acclamation by a gathering in Macquarie Street as evidence of the plaintiff's good reputation in the gay community." "Whether evidence of the conduct of others towards the plaintiff was inadmissible in chief as evidence of specific acts or facts illustrative of the plaintiff's reputation."]
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed evidence of applause and acclamation by the crowd was inadmissible in chief because its logical import depended on a specific act or fact involving the plaintiff, namely his championing or promoting anti-vilification legislation, and was therefore caught by the exclusionary principle against proving good reputation by particular acts or facts.
Court Disposition
Objection upheld; proposed line of questions disallowed.
Orders
- ["The line of questions to Mr Pickering concerning the crowd's conduct towards the plaintiff as evidence of reputation was disallowed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment