Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited [1999] NSWSC 1307

Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited [1999] NSWSC 1307

Documents 52 and 53 are excluded as evidence as they are compound hearsay and do not show the conduct of the defendant or its servants relating to the substance of the libel or persistence in it.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Plaintiff: John Marsden; Defendant: Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 December 1999
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Interlocutory Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence
Outcome
Tender rejected
Legal Topics
Admissibility of Evidence, Aggravated Damages
Defamation Admissibility of Evidence Aggravated Damages

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Marsden

Plaintiff

Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Defamation / Interlocutory Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence

  1. 1 Whether documents 52 and 53 are admissible on the issue of aggravated damages relating to increased hurt to feelings and reputation

Ratio Decidendi

Documents 52 and 53 are excluded as evidence as they are compound hearsay and do not show the conduct of the defendant or its servants relating to the substance of the libel or persistence in it.

Court Disposition

Tender rejected

Orders

  • Documents 52 and 53 will be MFI 63