Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited [1999] NSWSC 440
No substantive determination of the outstanding applications at this stage; directions given concerning the filing and exchange of submissions and the scheduling of oral argument.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 May 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Directions in Ongoing Defamation Proceedings / Interlocutory (directions Regarding Written and Oral Submissions for Outstanding Applications)
- Outcome
- Matter adjourned for further directions and timetable set for parties’ submissions and oral hearing.
- Legal Topics
- ['amendment of Defence' 'subpoena Application to Set Aside' 'justification Defence' 'directions Hearing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Directions in Ongoing Defamation Proceedings / Interlocutory (directions Regarding Written and Oral Submissions for Outstanding Applications)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the defendant should be permitted to amend its defence regarding justification' "Whether the plaintiff's application to set aside the subpoena to the Police Service should be granted"]
Ratio Decidendi
No substantive determination of the outstanding applications at this stage; directions given concerning the filing and exchange of submissions and the scheduling of oral argument.
Court Disposition
Matter adjourned for further directions and timetable set for parties’ submissions and oral hearing.
Orders
- ['Plaintiff to deliver written submissions in support of application to set aside subpoena by noon 11 May 1999.' "Defendant to deliver written submissions in support of amendment application and in opposition to plaintiff's subpoena application by noon 12 May 1999." 'Plaintiff to deliver submissions in response and...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment