Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited [2000] NSWSC 437
The evidence is allowed as it is relevant to the defendant’s case of truth regarding admissions by conduct; exclusion is premature and should be decided at the end of the evidence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation / Interlocutory Application to Exclude Evidence
- Outcome
- Application to exclude evidence refused; evidence allowed.
- Legal Topics
- ['exclusion of Evidence' 'admissions by Conduct']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Interlocutory Application to Exclude Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether evidence directed to admissions by conduct should be excluded']
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence is allowed as it is relevant to the defendant’s case of truth regarding admissions by conduct; exclusion is premature and should be decided at the end of the evidence.
Court Disposition
Application to exclude evidence refused; evidence allowed.
Orders
- ['I will allow the evidence.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment