Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited [2000] NSWSC 676
The claim for privilege over the documents in packet 438(b) is made out, and access is refused as they are confidential documents and communications brought into existence for the dominant purpose of providing legal services to the plaintiff in connection with this litigation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 July 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation / Interlocutory Decision on Privilege and Subpoena
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim for privilege over packet 438(b) upheld; access refused. Access to packets 438(a) and 438(c) granted to both parties.
- Legal Topics
- ['legal Professional Privilege' 'subpoena' 'document Production']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Interlocutory Decision on Privilege and Subpoena
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether documents produced by Mr Goold, solicitor, in response to subpoena are protected by legal professional privilege' 'Whether access to documents should be granted or refused']
Ratio Decidendi
The claim for privilege over the documents in packet 438(b) is made out, and access is refused as they are confidential documents and communications brought into existence for the dominant purpose of providing legal services to the plaintiff in connection with this litigation.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim for privilege over packet 438(b) upheld; access refused. Access to packets 438(a) and 438(c) granted to both parties.
Orders
- ['Documents in packet 438(a): access granted to parties.' 'Documents in packet 438(c): access granted to parties; no privilege applies.' 'Documents in packet 438(b): access refused to parties due to privilege.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment