Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited [2000] NSWSC 676

Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited [2000] NSWSC 676

The claim for privilege over the documents in packet 438(b) is made out, and access is refused as they are confidential documents and communications brought into existence for the dominant purpose of providing legal services to the plaintiff in connection with this litigation.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 July 2000
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Interlocutory Decision on Privilege and Subpoena
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim for privilege over packet 438(b) upheld; access refused. Access to packets 438(a) and 438(c) granted to both parties.
Legal Topics
['legal Professional Privilege' 'subpoena' 'document Production']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Defamation / Interlocutory Decision on Privilege and Subpoena

  1. 1 ['Whether documents produced by Mr Goold, solicitor, in response to subpoena are protected by legal professional privilege' 'Whether access to documents should be granted or refused']

Ratio Decidendi

The claim for privilege over the documents in packet 438(b) is made out, and access is refused as they are confidential documents and communications brought into existence for the dominant purpose of providing legal services to the plaintiff in connection with this litigation.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim for privilege over packet 438(b) upheld; access refused. Access to packets 438(a) and 438(c) granted to both parties.

Orders

  • ['Documents in packet 438(a): access granted to parties.' 'Documents in packet 438(c): access granted to parties; no privilege applies.' 'Documents in packet 438(b): access refused to parties due to privilege.']