Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited [1999] NSWSC 262

Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited [1999] NSWSC 262

The court ruled that most documents in question remain protected by legal professional privilege, but certain specified documents or parts of documents are not privileged and must be provided to the defendant.

Parties
Plaintiff: John Marsden; Defendant: Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
26 March 1999
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application Regarding Claim of Legal Professional Privilege
Outcome
Application granted in part
Legal Topics
Legal Professional Privilege, Subpoena for Production, Inspection of Documents

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Marsden

Plaintiff

Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interlocutory Application Regarding Claim of Legal Professional Privilege

  1. 1 Whether certain documents produced by Dr Dent under subpoena are protected by legal professional privilege
  2. 2 Whether the defendant is entitled to access specific documents despite the claim of privilege

Ratio Decidendi

The court ruled that most documents in question remain protected by legal professional privilege, but certain specified documents or parts of documents are not privileged and must be provided to the defendant.

Court Disposition

Application granted in part

Orders

  • Bulk of the documents in folder RWP 1 are presently protected by legal professional privilege.
  • Defendant is entitled to access: last page of document 1 comprising handwritten notes; document 3B in the edited form already produced; first page of document 6 to the extent of handwritten notes; document 8.