Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited [1999] NSWSC 164

If the plaintiff pursues his claim for privilege, then supporting and opposing evidence should be read and submissions heard.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 03 March 1999
Procedural Posture: Defamation / Interlocutory Application Regarding Privilege and Amendment of Defence
Outcome: Further evidence and submissions to be heard if privilege is pursued; no final orders given.
Legal Topics: ['privilege' 'procedure' 'amendment of Defence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Defamation / Interlocutory Application Regarding Privilege and Amendment of Defence

1 ["Whether the plaintiff's claim for privilege over certain documents should be upheld" 'Procedure for dealing with privilege claims in the context of an application to amend Defence']

If the plaintiff pursues his claim for privilege, then supporting and opposing evidence should be read and submissions heard.

Further evidence and submissions to be heard if privilege is pursued; no final orders given.