Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited [1999] NSWSC 408
The Court ordered that evidence relevant to the Corrs application re subpoena will also be evidence in the defendant's substantive application to amend and declined to vary this position.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: John Marsden; Defendant: Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited; On Subpoena: Corrs Chambers Westgarth
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 May 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Application (subpoena) in Defamation Proceeding / Reserved Decision on Corrs Chambers Westgarth Application Re Subpoena
- Outcome
- Decision reserved
- Legal Topics
- Subpoena, Application to Amend, Evidence Admissibility
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Marsden
Plaintiff
Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited
Defendant
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
On Subpoena
Procedural Posture
Application (subpoena) in Defamation Proceeding / Reserved Decision on Corrs Chambers Westgarth Application Re Subpoena
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether evidence adduced on the Corrs application re subpoena should also be evidence in the defendant's application to amend
Ratio Decidendi
The Court ordered that evidence relevant to the Corrs application re subpoena will also be evidence in the defendant's substantive application to amend and declined to vary this position.
Court Disposition
Decision reserved
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment