Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited [1999] NSWSC 71
The subpoena cannot be set aside on the grounds of lack of conceivable relevance, fishing, or manifest privilege; the material sought is generally relevant, and not all documents sought would attract privilege. The defendant is directed to further particularise the classes of documents requested such that clearly privileged material is excluded.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation / Interlocutory Application Regarding Subpoena to Produce Documents
- Outcome
- Application to set aside subpoena stood over; plaintiff's application not formally disposed; defendant directed to particularise requests for documents.
- Legal Topics
- ['subpoenas' 'client Legal Privilege' 'discovery' 'relevance of Documents' 'abuse of Process' 'fishing Expeditions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Interlocutory Application Regarding Subpoena to Produce Documents
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the subpoena issued to the plaintiff should be set aside on grounds of irrelevance, fishing, or privilege' 'Whether the material sought under the subpoena is manifestly privileged' 'Whether compliance with the subpoena would be oppressive']
Ratio Decidendi
The subpoena cannot be set aside on the grounds of lack of conceivable relevance, fishing, or manifest privilege; the material sought is generally relevant, and not all documents sought would attract privilege. The defendant is directed to further particularise the classes of documents requested such that clearly privileged material is excluded.
Court Disposition
Application to set aside subpoena stood over; plaintiff's application not formally disposed; defendant directed to particularise requests for documents.
Orders
- ['Call on subpoena stood over.' 'Defendant to provide particularisation of classes of documents and things to be produced as if under the subpoena for persons (a) to (e) in the schedule.' 'Defendant to provide particulars of basis of relevance and classes of documents for person (f) in the schedule.' 'Time for...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment