Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited [2000] NSWSC 573
Access to the original issued warrants could not be granted because the Court files did not contain any issued warrants, and where such warrants were produced to the Court from the Police Integrity Commission, s 56(2) of the Police Integrity Commission Act 1996 precluded disclosure absent a certificate. Thus, there existed no material to which the defendant’s application could relate, and the application was dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application (defendant's Notice of Motion for Access to Documents)
- Outcome
- Defendant's Notice of Motion dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['access to Court Documents' 'public Interest Immunity' 'listening Device Warrants']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application (defendant's Notice of Motion for Access to Documents)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the defendant should be granted access to Listening Device Act 1984 warrants held by the Court or the Police Integrity Commission' 'Whether public interest immunity or the Police Integrity Commission Act 1996 precludes such access']
Ratio Decidendi
Access to the original issued warrants could not be granted because the Court files did not contain any issued warrants, and where such warrants were produced to the Court from the Police Integrity Commission, s 56(2) of the Police Integrity Commission Act 1996 precluded disclosure absent a certificate. Thus, there existed no material to which the defendant’s application could relate, and the application was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Defendant's Notice of Motion dismissed
Orders
- ['The defendant’s Notice of Motion for access to warrants is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment