Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited [2000] NSWSC 425
The tendered police duty book and running sheet extracts were irrelevant and inadmissible because they merely recorded W2's prior consistent representations and did not independently corroborate that W2 spoke to the plaintiff or what the plaintiff said or did.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation Proceeding in the Common Law Division, Defamation List / Ex Tempore Ruling on Admissibility of Tendered Documents During Evidence
- Outcome
- Tendered documents ruled irrelevant and inadmissible.
- Legal Topics
- ['admissibility of Tender Documents' 'relevance' 'business Records Exception' 'hearsay' 'evidence Act 1995 (nsw) S 69(3)(b)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Defamation Proceeding in the Common Law Division, Defamation List / Ex Tempore Ruling on Admissibility of Tendered Documents During Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether extracts from police duty books and running sheets tendered by the defendant were relevant and admissible as corroboration of W2's evidence." 'Whether the documents were admissible as business records notwithstanding Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 69(3)(b).']
Ratio Decidendi
The tendered police duty book and running sheet extracts were irrelevant and inadmissible because they merely recorded W2's prior consistent representations and did not independently corroborate that W2 spoke to the plaintiff or what the plaintiff said or did.
Court Disposition
Tendered documents ruled irrelevant and inadmissible.
Orders
- ['The tendered documents will be marked for identification 170.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment