Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd [1999] NSWSC 123
A specific note directing the jury to consider alternative/fall-back imputations only if the primary is not found is not necessary. The jury should be left to consider which, if any, imputation is conveyed, provided with general directions in the summing up.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: John Marsden; Defendant: Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 February 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation / Ruling on Form of Questions to Be Answered by the Jury
- Outcome
- Ruling on form of questions: no inclusion of plaintiff's proposed specific note regarding sequential consideration of alternative imputations.
- Legal Topics
- Pleading of Fall Back Imputations, Jury Questions, Alternative Imputations, Directions to Jury
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Marsden
Plaintiff
Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Ruling on Form of Questions to Be Answered by the Jury
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a specific note should be included in questions to the jury indicating that alternative/fall-back imputations are to be considered only sequentially
Ratio Decidendi
A specific note directing the jury to consider alternative/fall-back imputations only if the primary is not found is not necessary. The jury should be left to consider which, if any, imputation is conveyed, provided with general directions in the summing up.
Court Disposition
Ruling on form of questions: no inclusion of plaintiff's proposed specific note regarding sequential consideration of alternative imputations.
Orders
- Final form of questions to the jury to be handed to counsel, with 'convey' substituted for 'carried' and 'or' inserted where imputations are pleaded in the alternative.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment