Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited [1999] NSWSC 410

Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited [1999] NSWSC 410

No application nor any order was made that the evidence in the Amendment Application be evidence in relation to Exhibits A, B and C on the application concerning the Corrs subpoena. The evidence therefore is confined as I have allowed and thus I confirmed the Order made on 28 April.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 May 1999
Procedural Posture
Application / Interlocutory Judgment on Evidence Relevant to Corrs Chambers Westgarth Subpoena
Outcome
Order confirmed – Evidence confined as allowed by previous order; no extension of evidence from Amendment Application to Corrs subpoena application.
Legal Topics
['privilege' 'immunity' 'confidentiality' 'inspection of Documents' 'subpoena']
['evidence'] ['privilege' 'immunity' 'confidentiality' 'inspection of Documents' 'subpoena']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application / Interlocutory Judgment on Evidence Relevant to Corrs Chambers Westgarth Subpoena

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether evidence relevant to Corrs Chambers Westgarth subpoena may be used in the substantive application to amend the defendant's case on justification" 'Issues of privilege, immunity and confidentiality relating to Exhibits A, B and C']

Ratio Decidendi

No application nor any order was made that the evidence in the Amendment Application be evidence in relation to Exhibits A, B and C on the application concerning the Corrs subpoena. The evidence therefore is confined as I have allowed and thus I confirmed the Order made on 28 April.

Court Disposition

Order confirmed – Evidence confined as allowed by previous order; no extension of evidence from Amendment Application to Corrs subpoena application.

Orders

  • ['Evidence relevant in application by Corrs Chambers Westgarth with respect to subpoena served upon it by defendant is evidence in the substantive application by the defendant to amend its case on justification (Order confirmed as made 28 April 1999).']