McLean v Power Coal [2001] NSWCC 121
No grounds have been established to rescind or reconsider the redemption order made on 19 March 2001; the applicant's consent was real and not vitiated, and a mere change of mind is insufficient.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion for Rescission And/or Reconsideration / Post Redemption Application; Motion Following Earlier Order on 19 March 2001
- Outcome
- No grounds made out for rescission or reconsideration. Matter to be relisted for hearing before Judge Duck. Costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- ['redemption of Entitlements' 'rescission or Reconsideration of Order' 'consent Vitiation' 'effect of Social Security Consequences' 'enforceability of Redemption Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion for Rescission And/or Reconsideration / Post Redemption Application; Motion Following Earlier Order on 19 March 2001
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether there are grounds to rescind or reconsider the redemption order made on 19 March 2001' "Whether the applicant's consent to the redemption was vitiated by factual error, confusion, or medication" 'Whether either party has a post-order option to withdraw from a redemption under s 15']
Ratio Decidendi
No grounds have been established to rescind or reconsider the redemption order made on 19 March 2001; the applicant's consent was real and not vitiated, and a mere change of mind is insufficient.
Court Disposition
No grounds made out for rescission or reconsideration. Matter to be relisted for hearing before Judge Duck. Costs reserved.
Orders
- ['Matter relisted for hearing before Judge Duck on a date to be arranged by the registry.' 'Costs reserved.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment