Meehan v Alfaro [1999] FCA 832
A Local Court judgment entered upon a costs assessor's certificate issued under s 208J of the Legal Profession Act 1987 (NSW)—even if arising from costs orders made in unconcluded Supreme Court proceedings—is a final judgment for the purposes of Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s 40(1)(g) and s 40(3)(b). The debtors' non-compliance with the bankruptcy notice founded on such a judgment was therefore an act of bankruptcy. The creditor's alleged intent to frustrate ongoing litigation did not constitute sufficient cause to refuse a sequestration order.
- Parties
- Applicant: John Meehan; First Respondent: Pedro Alfaro; Second Respondent: Silvia Gladys Alfaro
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Application for Review of Sequestration Orders / Application for Review of Sequestration Orders; Decision of Katz J Affirming Registrar's Orders
- Outcome
- Registrar's orders affirmed; sequestration orders made against debtors' estates
- Legal Topics
- Sequestration Orders, Bankruptcy Notice, Final Judgment, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Meehan
Applicant
Pedro Alfaro
First Respondent
Silvia Gladys Alfaro
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Application for Review of Sequestration Orders / Application for Review of Sequestration Orders; Decision of Katz J Affirming Registrar's Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether debtors committed an act of bankruptcy by non-compliance with bankruptcy notice
- 2 Whether the bankruptcy notice was a nullity because judgment relied on was not final
- 3 Whether a judgment of the Local Court founded on orders for costs made in unconcluded Supreme Court proceedings is a final judgment for the purposes of the Act
Ratio Decidendi
A Local Court judgment entered upon a costs assessor's certificate issued under s 208J of the Legal Profession Act 1987 (NSW)—even if arising from costs orders made in unconcluded Supreme Court proceedings—is a final judgment for the purposes of Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s 40(1)(g) and s 40(3)(b). The debtors' non-compliance with the bankruptcy notice founded on such a judgment was therefore an act of bankruptcy. The creditor's alleged intent to frustrate ongoing litigation did not constitute sufficient cause to refuse a sequestration order.
Court Disposition
Registrar's orders affirmed; sequestration orders made against debtors' estates
Orders
- The Registrar's orders of 16 February 1999 be affirmed.
- The petitioning creditor's costs of the review (including reserved costs, if any) be taxed and paid in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment